Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement is addressing allegations against a political figure and attempts to clarify the narrative around their actions, which is a matter of public concern and debate. The tone seems to be assertive and aims to refute claims made by a political party.
- The statement aims to refute allegations without causing harm, but the use of the word 'specious' could be seen as slightly inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individual by attempting to clear their name of allegations.Ā [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Ā [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could promote understanding by providing information, but the assertive tone may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by attempting to refute allegations, but it does not engage in dialogue with those in disagreement.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement corrects what the author perceives as a mistake in the public narrative.Ā [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to influence public opinion and attempts to do so with integrity, though the assertiveness could be perceived as lacking in neutrality.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.