The statement presents a critical perspective on media coverage, suggesting that there is a display of 'class hatred' by the New York Times and MSNBC in their response to a new book. The tone is accusatory and implies a negative bias in the media outlets' coverage. The image accompanying the statement depicts a barn with a star on it, with the words 'PANIC', 'WHITE', 'RURAL', and 'RAGE' superimposed over a red and white striped background, which may be interpreted as a visual representation of the statement's theme of division and alarm.
- The statement could be seen as promoting division rather than doing no harm, as it uses charged language like 'slobber over' and 'undisguised class hatred'. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by not targeting specific persons, but it does generalize media outlets in a potentially disrespectful manner.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it frames the issue in confrontational terms. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While the statement engages in criticism, it may not be seen as constructive due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to critique media behavior, but it may not necessarily be for the betterment of society if it contributes to polarization. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform with integrity if the criticism is not presented in a fair and balanced manner. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.