Robbie Martin
@FluorescentGrey
·
570d
The statement in question is part of a heated exchange on social media. The tone is confrontational and defensive, with the intent to challenge an accusation and seek clarification. The content addresses the use of serious allegations without legal conviction and the hyperbolic suggestion of being sent to The Hague for asking questions.
- The statement seeks to avoid harm by challenging the use of unproven allegations, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of individuals by questioning the labeling of someone as a 'rapist' without conviction, adhering to the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is part of a confrontational exchange, thus not fully upholding this principle. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement attempts to engage in dialogue and seeks clarification, which aligns with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.