The statement expresses frustration with perceived censorship and advocates for the ability to raise questions about the potential adverse impact of vaccines. The tone suggests a desire for open dialogue and the sharing of information, which can be seen as a call for free speech. However, the use of the term 'bullshit' can be considered disrespectful and may undermine constructive discourse. The image shows a screenshot of a social media post by a media personality discussing a vaccine study, with a label indicating that the information has been reviewed and found to be 'Partly false information.'
- The use of harsh language may be seen as harmful to respectful discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly violate the privacy or dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement calls for dialogue but does so in a manner that may not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a willingness to acknowledge or correct mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement aims to use influence to promote a discussion, but the approach may not be conducive to the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement supports free speech but may not be using the platform with integrity due to the disrespectful language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.