The statement is critical of immigration policies and links a specific criminal case to broader policy decisions.
- The statement presents a case that could potentially cause harm by stigmatizing a group based on the actions of an individual, which could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the victim by not naming them, but it may violate the dignity of others by using the term 'illegal alien,' which is considered dehumanizing by some groups. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a criminal case to criticize immigration policy without a broader context, which could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it presents a one-sided view without suggesting solutions or engaging with counterarguments, which could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a mistake in the form of a policy decision but does not correct it or suggest how to correct it.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses its platform to critique policy, which is a responsible use of influence, but the language used may not uphold integrity to the fullest extent due to its potential to stigmatize. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.