Michele McKeon
@MicheleMcKeon
·
622d
The statement is part of a conversation about media credibility and the influence of public figures. It suggests that ignoring influential figures because of disagreement is not effective and implies the importance of engaging with a variety of viewpoints.
- The statement contributes to public discourse by addressing the issue of media engagement with controversial figures. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by acknowledging the influence of a public figure without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting that ignoring influential figures is not a productive approach. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement encourages dialogue with those in disagreement by implying that engagement with different viewpoints is necessary. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not directly acknowledge or correct mistakes, as it is an opinion.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to discuss the betterment of public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by advocating for engagement with a variety of viewpoints. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.