The statement is critical of government actions that the speaker believes infringe on personal freedoms, specifically referencing the potential for an app to be removed from phones under the guise of national security. The statement also points out an irony in Joe Biden joining TikTok, a platform that could potentially be banned.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but expresses concern over government actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise awareness about a potential issue of concern.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government actions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments against individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a societal issue, which could be seen as working for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by expressing a viewpoint on a public policy issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.