Matt Taibbi

The statement refers to a cover story from New York Magazine titled 'Freedom of Sex' and critiques it as 'The Year's Dumbest Cover Story,' describing it as an example of 'lunatic nihilism that's consumed America's intellectual class.' The statement engages in public discourse by critiquing media content and its perceived impact on intellectual discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement potentially harms the reputation of the magazine and the author by labeling the work as 'dumb' and 'lunatic nihilism,' which could be seen as derogatory rather than constructive. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not show respect for the dignity of the author or the intellectual efforts behind the magazine's cover story, as it uses dismissive language rather than engaging with the content's arguments. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a tone of empathy or compassion, opting instead for a harsh critique that does not seek to understand or engage with differing viewpoints. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue. It labels the story as 'dumb' without providing substantive critique or opening a space for discussion. [-2]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of an effort to correct or acknowledge any previous misunderstandings; the statement is purely critical.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of dismissive and derogatory language may not contribute positively to societal betterment or intellectual discourse. [-1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses its platform to criticize, but it does so in a way that may not uphold the integrity of responsible and respectful discourse. [-1]