Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement appears to be a commentary on a political issue, specifically referencing a bill related to TikTok and the powers it would grant to the President of the United States. The tone seems to be sarcastic, suggesting that if former President Trump expressed enthusiasm for the bill, it might lead to its failure in the Democratic Senate. The intent seems to be to highlight potential political maneuvering and the implications of the bill.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but uses sarcasm to make a point. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political strategy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to comment on a societal issue, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society by questioning the bill. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss a public policy responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.