The statement is a clear expression of a political stance on data privacy legislation and the regulation of technology companies. It addresses a public issue, namely the regulation of big tech and data privacy, and it provides a rationale for a specific legislative decision - voting against a ban on TikTok. The tone is assertive and aims to inform the public about the speaker's position on a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, as it advocates for comprehensive legislation rather than a ban. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by advocating for data privacy. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the reasoning behind the speaker's vote and the need for comprehensive legislation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a one-off ban, without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to argue for the betterment of society through comprehensive legislation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform responsibly to express a political stance. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.