Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement is critical of the Democratic National Committee's decision to counter third-party and independent presidential candidates, suggesting that such actions are taken because these candidates pose a legitimate threat to the established political order. It implies that the Green Party has been effective in challenging power, contrary to some opinions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but is confrontational in tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.Ā [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on a combative stance.Ā [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes a defiant assertion.Ā [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a mistake being made or acknowledged.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to assert a position in the political discourse, which could be seen as contributing to societal debate.Ā [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a political viewpoint responsibly.Ā [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.