Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement is a critical commentary on the potential ban of TikTok, suggesting political motivations influenced by lobbying groups and calling for public action against censorship.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies wrongdoing and could potentially harm reputations without providing concrete evidence. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not violate privacy or dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement's accusatory tone may not encourage constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The call to action is intended to prevent censorship, which the author perceives as the betterment of society. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement advocates for free speech by opposing the ban of TikTok. [+1]