In reply to:
Burt Macklin
@BurtMaclin_FBI
·
554d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
554d
The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter that discusses the implications of a bill related to the ownership of a major communications platform and the role of intelligence agencies in influencing such decisions. The conversation touches upon issues of free speech, government control, and foreign influence, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement contributes to promoting understanding by questioning the motives behind a legislative push, which could foster empathy and compassion for those affected by the bill. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the relationship between the FBI, ODNI, and the legislative process without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question potential government actions, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by questioning the potential for government overreach in controlling a communications platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.