Brian Krassenstein
@krassenstein
·
613d
The statement is critical of content moderation policies that the author perceives as politically motivated. It raises concerns about the balance between free speech and platform moderation, suggesting that moderation may be used to silence dissenting opinions rather than just to control hate speech.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather expresses concern over potential censorship. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not targeting any individual. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting the importance of discussing content moderation policies. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not directly engage in constructive criticism but does open the door for dialogue on the issue.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes as it is an opinion.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to question the integrity of moderation policies, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.