Robert Kennedy Jr

The statement involves a political stance and a call to action, specifically advocating for the pardon of Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, and urging a political figure to adopt a similar stance. It touches on issues of government transparency and the treatment of individuals who have disclosed sensitive information.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to influence political decisions and public opinion, potentially impacting the lives of the individuals mentioned and broader policies on transparency and accountability. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of Assange and Snowden by advocating for their pardon, though it could be seen as dismissive towards the perspectives of those who view their actions as harmful to national security.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The use of the term 'Military Intel deep state' may detract from fostering understanding, as it could be interpreted as promoting conspiracy theories rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The call for action is clear, but the divisive language used may not encourage a balanced or empathetic discussion on the issue. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge the complex legal and ethical dimensions of the Assange and Snowden cases, nor does it correct any potential misinformation. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses a public platform to advocate for a significant political action, but the manner in which it is done may not fully uphold the integrity expected in responsible discourse.