In reply to:
John F. Felter
@johnfelter
·
424d
Christopher C. Cuomo
@ChrisCuomo
·
424d
TheGeorge2239
@TheGeorge2239
·
425d
The statement is part of a conversation on social media that addresses the issue of political division, media responsibility, and the concept of deplatforming or censorship. The tone of the statement is critical and suggests that the current approach to political discourse is not effective and is exacerbating division. The intent seems to be to argue for a different approach to handling political disagreements and media narratives.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm, but it does not explicitly strive to avoid harm either.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement calls for a reconsideration of current practices, which could be seen as an attempt to promote understanding, though it lacks a clear call for empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement suggests a desire to use influence to improve societal discourse, which aligns with the principle of betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and appears to use the platform responsibly, though it criticizes the concept of deplatforming. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.