Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement is a critique of US foreign policy, specifically the use of embargoes against Cuba and Palestine. It accuses the US of using hunger as a weapon and labels the president as 'Genocide Joe', calling for an end to these embargoes. The tone is accusatory and urgent, and the intent is to call for policy change and highlight the perceived injustices caused by these embargoes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses the US of committing a crime against humanity, which could be seen as harmful language towards those involved in policy-making. However, it is also a call to prevent harm to civilian populations, aligning with the principle in that context. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of individuals outside of the public figure it names, and it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech towards private individuals.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a tone of understanding or empathy towards those implementing the policies but does express empathy towards the affected civilian populations. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The use of the term 'Genocide Joe' constitutes a personal attack and an ad hominem argument against the US president, which violates this principle. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to use influence to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for the end of actions perceived as harmful to civilian populations. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by using the platform to express a strong opinion on public policy, but the integrity of the message is compromised by the use of a personal attack. [-1]