The statement appears to be a metaphorical comparison between open-sourced AI and closed AI systems, likening them to hiring graduates versus consultants. The tone is neutral and informative, and the intent seems to be to express a preference for open-sourced AI in terms of innovation and self-reliance. The content does not contain any harmful, disrespectful, or non-constructive elements.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on AI without any negative connotations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue by presenting a comparison that others may agree or disagree with, without being confrontational. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement suggests a preference for open-sourced AI, which could be seen as advocating for a practice that the speaker believes is for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.