The statement is a critique of the relationship between the White House and Facebook regarding the control of media distribution, which implies a concern for free press principles. The conversation involves a public figure's opinion on the matter, responding to another user's comment about the choice of issues to focus on. The linked content provides context but is not directly related to the statement's main point.
- The statement aims to highlight a potential harm to the principle of a free press, but does not directly cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by bringing attention to a potential issue of media control and transparency. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the White House's actions without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a societal issue, which could be seen as working for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by criticizing potential overreach by the government. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.