The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
·
244d
The statement is critical and expresses concern over government transparency and accountability. It suggests that the redaction of a document by the CDC is a form of contempt for the public and a threat to democratic values. The intent is to call for greater transparency and to hold the CDC accountable for its actions.
- The statement aims to do no harm but rather to highlight a perceived wrongdoing and call for corrective action. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the actions of an institution rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to the issue of transparency in government. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the CDC's actions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a mistake in the form of excessive redaction and calls for correction. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the speaker's platform to advocate for transparency and democratic principles. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.