Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is critical of the legal actions taken against Julian Assange, framing them as unjust and a threat to press freedom and democracy. It calls for action to defend these principles by advocating for Assange's freedom.
- The statement aims to do no harm but is critical of government actions, which it views as harmful to society. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of Julian Assange and does not engage in personal attacks against individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not contain hate speech but is critical of government policies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on the importance of press freedom and the implications of Assange's case. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is a form of constructive criticism of government actions. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement corrects what the speaker sees as a misconception about the nature of Assange's legal situation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the speaker's platform to advocate for a cause they believe will benefit society and upholds the principle of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.