Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement criticizes the efforts to ban TikTok, framing it as part of a broader campaign to control information and suppress free speech. It calls for action to oppose this perceived censorship.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm but could be seen as polarizing by suggesting a concerted effort to suppress free speech without providing specific evidence.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The call to action promotes engagement and dialogue on the issue of free speech and censorship. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement corrects a perceived societal mistake by advocating against the ban of TikTok. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to address a societal issue, urging others to use their voting power to influence policy. [+1]