Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
The statement is a critical commentary on a judicial nominee's past professional affiliations and actions, specifically in relation to her work with hedge funds during Puerto Rico's debt crisis. It addresses the societal issue of judicial appointments and their implications for justice and representation, particularly for the people of Puerto Rico.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but rather to highlight a concern about the nominee's past actions and their potential impact on her role as a judge. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on professional actions rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing instead on criticism of the nominee's professional history. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks; it remains focused on professional conduct. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to question the suitability of a judicial nominee for the betterment of society, particularly for the people of Puerto Rico. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to raise a concern about a public figure responsibly, without spreading misinformation or engaging in harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.