Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement is critical of corporate tax breaks, suggesting they have negative consequences for community investment and well-being. It implies a causal relationship between tax policy and community health, which is a substantive claim about economic and social policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a perceived harm caused by tax policy without causing harm to individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement implicitly promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on the consequences of tax policy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites dialogue on the issue of tax policy and its effects on communities. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge counterarguments or data that might contradict the claim, but it does not appear to be factually incorrect.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss a societal issue responsibly. [+1]