The statement is critical of the way studies are handled in public discourse, implying that there are biases or agendas influencing the interpretation of scientific data.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but does express skepticism about the motivations behind the interpretation of studies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individual. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a constructive approach to promoting understanding, as it does not provide specific examples or evidence to support the claim of bias. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence to better society as it does not offer a constructive solution or alternative approach to the issue. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform with clear integrity, as it makes a broad claim without substantiation.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.