Cornel West

Rank 5 of 47
|
Score 232

The statement is a critique of Congress's actions regarding the banning of a digital platform, presumably TikTok, and is a call to protect free speech. The tone is critical but not disrespectful, and the intent is to advocate for the importance of free speech and the role of digital platforms in fostering dialogue and progress. The content addresses a societal issue related to policy and public concern, thus it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not intend to harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and compassion for the role of digital platforms in societal progress. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of Congress without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by protecting free speech. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]