Christopher C. Cuomo

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -30

The statement acknowledges the importance of CNN as a news organization and suggests that there are individuals within the organization who work for the right reasons, despite personal grievances with the way the speaker was treated by their bosses. The speaker also distinguishes their perspective from that of another individual, suggesting a difference in approach or character without engaging in personal attacks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on expressing a personal perspective on the role of CNN and its employees. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, mentioning individuals only in the context of their professional roles and without disclosing private information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not contain any elements of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The speaker promotes understanding by acknowledging the positive aspects of CNN and its employees. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement is part of a dialogue and does not involve criticism that could be construed as non-constructive. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The speaker corrects a potential misconception by clarifying their stance on returning to CNN and their view of another individual. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The speaker uses their platform to express their views on media integrity and the importance of journalistic purpose, contributing to a broader societal discussion. [+1]