Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement advocates for electoral reform through ranked-choice voting, which is a substantive public issue. It does so without harmful language or personal attacks, respecting the principles of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is non-harmful and advocates for a change in the voting system. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes a voting system that may foster understanding and empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is focused on the issue and does not attack individuals. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The advocacy for ranked-choice voting is presented as a societal improvement. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly exercises free speech on a public policy issue. [+1]