Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement is a commentary on a report about the Democratic National Committee and allied groups' alleged plans to legally challenge third-party candidates. It implies that such actions are antithetical to democratic principles by suggesting that democracy should include free choice. The linked article's title and description further emphasize the concern over the impact of these actions on voter choice and reference a historical event to draw a parallel to current political strategies.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, but rather raises concerns about democratic processes. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the potential impact of legal challenges to third-party candidates on democratic choice. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the reported actions without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to discuss the importance of voter choice and the implications for society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a matter of public concern with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.