Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement appears to be a response to a political discussion about the Democratic National Committee's actions and the treatment of Jill Stein. It criticizes the use of a particular argument against Stein, implying it is unfounded or exaggerated. The tone is dismissive and sarcastic, and the intent seems to be to discredit the argument and defend Stein.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm, but the dismissive tone could be seen as slightly harmful to constructive discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not reveal personal information or engage in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses another viewpoint without engaging in a constructive manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on a personal attack with the use of 'ridiculous' and 'BS smears,' which could be seen as ad hominem. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.