Gavin Newsom

The statement provides a critical perspective on the House Republican budget proposal, highlighting aspects such as raising the retirement age, cutting Medicare, stripping health care from millions, and implementing a national abortion ban and limits on IVF. The tone is informative and carries a sense of urgency to inform the public about potential policy changes.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to inform without causing harm, but the language used ('stripping millions of their health care') could be perceived as alarmist, potentially causing distress. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion, focusing more on criticism than promoting understanding. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather presents the information in a way that could polarize. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge any potential mistakes or provide a balanced view. [-1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to inform the public about potential policy changes, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging informed civic engagement. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech by sharing information about government policies, but it could be more responsible by ensuring a balanced and less polarizing presentation.