Mike Johnson

The statement and accompanying image present a critical view of the current administration's border policies, suggesting a correlation between border security and national security. The image provides a specific figure to support the claim of increased illegal crossings.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight concerns about national security without directly causing harm, but it may contribute to a polarized view on the issue.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of others in a general sense but does not address the complexity of individuals involved in border crossings. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy towards individuals affected by border policies and does not promote understanding of the nuanced reasons behind migration. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes a blanket assertion about the administration's policies. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge the complexity of border security issues or the efforts that may be in place to address them. [-1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to critique the administration, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by raising security concerns, but it does so without providing a balanced perspective.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use the platform with full integrity, given the lack of context and potential for misinterpretation.