In reply to:
Zaid Jilani
@ZaidJilani
·
231d
Scott Holcomb
@RepScottHolcomb
·
232d
The statement is part of a conversation on social media that engages with the issue of criminal justice and the legislative process related to wrongful conviction compensation. The tone is somewhat dismissive and confrontational, and the intent seems to be to diminish the other person's argument by comparing their contributions to the issue. The content addresses the significance of state laws versus federal/global censorship programs and the speaker's own credentials in the field of criminal justice.
- The statement does minor harm by being dismissive of another's contributions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but slightly impinges on dignity by belittling another's efforts. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is dismissive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of personal attack by comparing credentials rather than focusing on constructive criticism of the issue at hand. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not clearly use influence for the betterment of society; it is more focused on self-promotion and discrediting another's viewpoint.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.