Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement appears to be a reflection on a book that discusses a societal issue, specifically the belief in the value of a four-year degree. The tone is contemplative and suggests a challenge to a commonly held belief based on 'the latest research.' The intent seems to be to provoke thought and potentially reevaluate the assumption that a four-year degree is universally the best path.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing research that may challenge a common belief. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning a societal belief without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to potentially better society by encouraging critical thinking about education paths. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, contributing to a public issue discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.