The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter that involves a discussion about journalistic integrity, the handling of sources, and the impact of political bias on reporting. The tone is defensive and explanatory, with the intent to justify the actions taken during the reporting process. The content addresses the dilemma of when to cut ties with a source and the importance of obtaining material for a story, even when it involves dealing with difficult individuals or agencies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but is defensive in nature.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of the reporter's actions but lacks a tone of empathy or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges the dilemma faced but does not explicitly correct any mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement implies an intent to use influence for the betterment of society by obtaining important material for a story. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of platform, despite the criticism received. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.