Jackie Adkins
@jackieandcocoa
·
265d
The statement is part of a multi-layered conversation on social media that appears to be addressing the issue of how public figures and ideas are discussed and critiqued in the media. The tone is confrontational and critical, and the intent seems to be to challenge the approach taken by a media personality in engaging with controversial figures and ideas. The content suggests a concern with the impact of demonizing individuals rather than addressing their ideas, and the potential consequences for public discourse and persuasion.
- The statement does not appear to actively seek to do harm, but the confrontational tone may not fully align with the principle of doing no harm with words.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly suggests using influence for the betterment of society by critiquing media practices that may alienate audiences rather than persuade them. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.