Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of media coverage by @thehill, specifically regarding the reporting on ballot access related to RFK's campaign compared to the Green Party's achievements. The tone is critical but not disrespectful, and the intent is to highlight perceived media bias or oversight. The content addresses the issue of media coverage of political campaigns, which is a matter of public interest and contributes to the civic dialogue on media fairness and political representation.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by pointing out a discrepancy in media coverage. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for fair media coverage, which could be seen as bettering society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.