Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing government actions related to freedom of speech, censorship, and the potential suppression of media outlets. It references a specific Supreme Court case and government policies, which are matters of public concern and debate.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, but rather expresses concern over potential harm to free speech. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the potential implications of government actions on free speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government policies without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to raise awareness about issues related to free speech and censorship. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss matters of public integrity responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.