The statement is critical of the Democratic Party, suggesting that their stance on issues related to genocide is causing voters to look for alternatives. It promotes a specific political figure, Jill Stein, as a new option for voters. The tone is one of advocacy for political change and a call to action.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but does use charged language that could be seen as divisive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement promotes a particular political viewpoint, which could foster understanding among those who agree, but may not promote empathy or compassion towards those with differing views.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political party, but it does not engage in constructive dialogue with those in disagreement. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement corrects a perceived mistake by suggesting an alternative political option. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a political cause, which could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society according to the speaker's viewpoint. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.