Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of media coverage, specifically addressing the perceived disparity in reporting on ballot access between a well-known political figure with substantial resources and a less prominent figure from the Green Party. The tone is critical and implies a call for more equitable media representation. The content focuses on the issue of media bias and the challenges faced by smaller political parties in gaining recognition.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the challenges faced by smaller political parties, showing empathy for their situation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for more equitable media coverage, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to discuss issues of public interest responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.