Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
1131d
The statement is a critical commentary on recent political statements and actions regarding NATO and Ukraine, suggesting a potential escalation to war with Russia. It expresses a strong disapproval of the current administration's foreign policy decisions, implying they could lead to catastrophic consequences.
- The statement uses hyperbolic language that could be seen as fear-mongering, which may indirectly cause harm by inciting anxiety or panic. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on criticism and alarm. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on personal attack by suggesting a deliberate intent ('Biden seems determined to start WWIII') without substantiating this claim. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement's intent seems to be to alert and mobilize public opinion against a potential war, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment, albeit in a confrontational manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not be using the platform with full responsibility and integrity, given the accusatory and unverified nature of the claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.