Mike Johnson

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -18

The statement is a critique of the current political stance of the President regarding the conflict involving Israel and Hamas. It suggests that the President should redirect his ultimatums towards Hamas rather than Israel, citing Hamas's actions and the need to support an ally facing an existential threat.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to influence policy without causing harm, focusing on political strategy rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the actions of political entities rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, and compassion, as it takes a firm stance against Hamas without acknowledging the complexity of the conflict. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the President's policy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to argue for what the author believes is the betterment of society by supporting an ally. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech, using the platform responsibly to express a political viewpoint with integrity. [+1]