Jill Stien

The statement is critical of certain members of Congress and accuses them of attempting to make student debt cancellation illegal through legislative means. It calls for collective action from those affected by student debt.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to inform and mobilize without causing harm, but the language used ('sneaking test language', 'beat Wall Street’s politicians') could be seen as confrontational.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, although it does name specific members of Congress, which is a common practice in political discourse. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement encourages collective action, which could be seen as promoting understanding and empathy among those affected by student debt. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not provide evidence for the claim, which could be seen as a failure to correct misinformation if the claim is unfounded. [-1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to encourage action on a societal issue. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses the platform to engage in a responsible manner, although the confrontational language could be seen as less than fully responsible.