Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today
@JordanSchachtel
·
308d
The statement is critical in tone, with a clear intent to address perceived corruption in the pharmaceutical industry and propose a policy response. The content refers to a specific case involving Pfizer and Paxlovid, and it makes a political promise for action under a potential future administration.
- The statement intends to do no harm but does not consider the potential consequences of public shaming or legal action against individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not targeting individuals but rather the corporate entity and its actions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on punitive measures. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a public issue but does not invite dialogue or discussion for those in disagreement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment through promises of reform and accountability. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by raising a concern about a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.