Jonathan Turley
@JonathanTurley
·
167d
The statement by @JonathanTurley addresses the issue of free speech and its interpretation within academic circles, specifically referencing the stance of a former law dean on what constitutes protected speech. The content of the statement is a critique of the current teaching and understanding of free speech principles, suggesting that there is a generation being incorrectly educated on the matter. The tone appears to be concerned and critical of the current state of free speech education.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to raise concern about the education on free speech. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of a public figure's stance on free speech without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to correct what the author sees as a mis-teaching, which could be for the betterment of society by fostering a correct understanding of free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by critiquing the limitations being taught and discussed in academic settings. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.