In reply to:
MommaBear96
@Bear96Momma
·
223d
The statement '@Bear96Momma @VP @POTUS Seriously?' is a reply in a thread discussing public figures and their statements on policy issues such as border control and the economy. The tone is one of disbelief or skepticism, and the intent seems to be to question or challenge the claims made by the Vice President and President. The content, while brief, is a response to perceived misinformation or 'BS' as stated by the original poster in the thread.
- The statement does no harm but lacks substantive content.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, no harassment or hate speech is present. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it attack anyone personally.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not clearly use influence for the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform with significant integrity or responsibility.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.