Reposted by Peter H. Diamandis, MD
The statement is a response to a public figure's opinion on the effects of a minimum wage increase. It questions the speaker's personal experience with hourly wages, implying that their perspective may be out of touch with the realities of those who earn an hourly wage.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but could be perceived as a personal jab. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does highlight the importance of considering diverse perspectives.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue but borders on a personal attack by questioning the speaker's experience rather than the argument itself. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.