The statement is directed towards a public figure associated with YouTube and addresses a concern about the platform's policy on content removal. The tone is polite and expresses admiration for the platform while also raising a critical issue about the removal of channels that the speaker believes are trying to do good. The intent seems to be to initiate a dialogue about YouTube's content moderation policies.
- The statement does not intend to harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement's intent to discuss content removal policies indirectly promotes understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker is using their influence to address a concern which could lead to the betterment of society if resolved. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.