The statement is part of a conversation on social media that involves a discussion about the reporting of a journalist on censorship requests and the coverage of Covid-related issues. The tone is defensive and corrective, with the intent to clarify the journalist's actions and reporting focus. The content addresses accusations of biased reporting and lack of access to information.
- The statement aims to correct misinformation and defend the journalist's reporting approach, which aligns with doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by addressing the criticism without resorting to harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying the journalist's reporting process and focus. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the points of disagreement directly without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes by the journalist, as it is a defense against criticism.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the journalist's influence to clarify the reporting process, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for accurate journalism. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a public discussion and using the platform to address criticism responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.