Ayanna Pressley

The statement engages with public health policy regarding the medication mifepristone and its access, presenting information intended to clarify facts and counteract fiction.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement presents information intended to inform and clarify without causing harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement maintains respect for individuals and does not engage in harmful language. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It aims to promote understanding by distinguishing between what it presents as fact and fiction. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of the role of judges versus public health experts in medication regulation. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no personal attack or ad hominem argument in the statement. [+1]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it presents the information as factual.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement advocates for the protection of access to a medical service, which could be interpreted as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]